About the work
Feeling the heat is...
a visually spectacular triptych featuring rare thermographic imagery of natural and built environments and, in between, climate scientists interviewed with their own thermal imaging equipment.
The work explores a new approach to climate change communication, which frees normally objective professionals to talk to us in a subjective, even passionate manner. How do the disturbing implications of climate change affect the scientists tasked with studying it — on a personal level? Despite the existential dimensions of their research they’re usually expected to eschew emotion, adhering to detached, dispassionate modes of the scientific method lest it taint their empirical assemblage of evidence. But even when they do so, they may find themselves targets of those who would rather not hear their rationalised conclusions. As a result of their research they’re “feeling the heat” in more ways than one.
The artwork forms part of Adam Sébire's PhD research into aesthetic visual representations of climate change. This collaboration with climate scientists uses a thermographic imager usually employed to measure leaf temperatures during heatwaves. Using it for infrared thermal interviews ‘cloaks’ the scientists visually — as heat data — allowing them to speak anonymously, candidly and personally, whilst engaging a wider audience.
There is increasing literature documenting scientists’ despondency ('climate-related depression’). Clive Hamilton describes them as “modern-day Cassandras” whose warnings go unheeded. Their research often requires them to “think the unthinkable” as they venture to the far end of probability curves. Their recommendations follow the Precautionary Principle — hoping for the best while preparing for the worst.
Yet the science of climate change is all too frequently eclipsed by its short-termist politics and the temptation of some is to shoot the messenger. Scientists expressing an emotional response (to a problem which threatens to make the planet unliveable for many of its species) therefore remains taboo, and climate science communication is largely confined to probabilities, tables, graphs and data.
Scientists, for their part, often assume that given enough of the right information people will modify their behaviour accordingly. However climate change is proving that a response takes more than knowledge of the scientific consensus. Climate psychology suggests an emotional connection is necessary. For a problem with such major implications, purely dispassionate presentation of evidence may not help its societal acceptance. And so this work offers viewers a different point of entry.